If one sexual orientation is befitting of minority status, wouldn't all sexual orientations thereby deserve the same?
When you say that one race cannot be discriminated against because their race makes them a minority, you are saying that for all races.
If you argue the same in court for sexual orientation then other sexual orientations can argue the exact same thing. Courts cannot ignore precedence when considering such cases and could not legally find against one and not the other.
Sexual orientation is not a minority status. Making it one for the purpose of driving an agenda is a slippery slope which will reak havoc on the institution of marriage.
Either they are too dumb to know that; or it is their intent. Which do you think it is?
by: Keith D. Rodebush